"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence"
-- Carl Sagan
Do
you believe in Santa? The
question is rather rhetorical. It is the belief in anything
supernatural that has the power to 'reward' those who have been
'good' and 'punish' the 'bad' ones. This judge, who is widely called
God. It is the question of his existence or none and the judgements
associated with it. How someone answers this brings along with it a
lot of opinions. Between Yes, I do
and
No, I don't, our judgements cross the bridge of
orthodoxicty to rationality.
Then there is a third type - like me - who are a welcome grey in the
world of black and white - agnostics.
It
is very easy to justify a No. He
is a figment of our imagination and
obviously there
is no evidence to
prove that
he exists. Impossible
to justify is
a Yes. Does this issue then boil down to mere
subjectivity? If one can neither prove nor disprove his presence,
shouldn't the correct answer be I don't know?
There
are plenty of articles and books on theism, atheism, pantheism etc
and it is not in my ability to discuss them here. Rather, I will
plainly put across my views in this subject – something that only I
am capable of doing.
I
would like to narrate a particular incident here. A few months back,
I was returning home from dinner with a group of friends when the
discussion about theism erupted. It went along the lines of one
friend mocking the concept of God and the other trying to defend the
idea of God. The second friend looked at the first and told him that
he should be afraid of mocking God lest His anger befall on him. The
first friend was amused and he instantly looked up at the sky and
challenged “Come on, hit me with your best”. Almost
involuntarily, I silently prayed “No, don't do that to him” to
that fictitious something
out
there in the universe. Later on
contemplation,
it
simply
demonstrated a sense of fear in me that I have internalized.
Definitely, there is nobody in space who would listen to such
challenges and act upon them. My absurd reaction was simply for the
fear of any untoward occurrence to my loved one, however well I know
that this will not happen. This brings us to the natural question:
Perhaps it is the fear that drives people to pray, isn't it? Again, whatever
way it originates, as long as it limited to constructing an arena in
our minds where we can take shelter when in trouble – a reassurance
– I would still
call
it a positive effect.
The
history of unconventional discoveries in physics itself have time and
again shown to us
that
we are in a constant process of learning and unlearning. In fact, the
way science and God are segregated, it is paradoxical that I should
use the example of the discoveries in science to accentuate the idea
of God, but in my mind, the idea of God is simply one elegant theory.
Definitely, for me, God is not someone deep seated in heaven who
created Earth and now keeps an account of the sins committed by mere
mortals or who can bend the laws of nature. (An
expanding universe does not preclude a creator, but it does place
limits on when he might have carried out his job - Stephen Hawking).
I do not also mean the common (mis)conception about God who has to be
pleased and sacrificed for, or any other man-made representations of
Him. Rather, I am simply keeping an open mind that perhaps – just
perhaps -
there is something
that
our mind is not capable of comprehending currently (maybe an idea,
Nature, our unused part of minds or something else),
and that probable incomprehensibality for me
is
God.
Also,
while I strongly oppose the propaganda meted out by the
fundamentalists who forcefully impose their belief in the presence of
their
Almighty.
For me, it is also equally not correct
to
mock the IDEA as well. After all, Absence of
evidence is not evidence of absence. How
will but one, prove the unprovable?
Having
said all this, we should understand why such a discussion is
necessary. God is often simply (read wrongly) portrayed as a
representative of a particular religion. A few days across, I came
across forwards in my Facebook newsfeed. It read something like this:
“There are N
religions in the world, some say N
are wrong and some N-1”.
This
satire has indeed put across a strong statement. It amuses and at the
same time irritates me to see how people (actually!) believe that the
religion they are born with is true and ultimate while the rest are
not. Needless to say, many opportunists cash on this very aspect of
division with ulterior motives and while their wrong doing is
obvious, it is mandatory that we also look into ourselves and check
if we are contributing. In that, I also consider silence as a vice,
with adverse effects.
In the end, I believe, if religion is already doing us more harm than
good, shouldn't we perhaps do away with the divide and simply accept
the idea of humanity? As John Lenon has beautifully lyricised:
Imagine there's
no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion, too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion, too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one
-- John Lenon